Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Higley v. Harvonek
as 23-6096
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIP HIGLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
KAMERON HARVONEK
Norman v. US Attorney General
as 23-50360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Norman
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Attorney General, for the Western District of Texas, Kim Ogg, District Attorney, Harris County, Glenn Hegar, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and others
Gilton v. St. Mary Parish District Attorney et al
as 6:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gilton
Defendant:
District Attorney St Mary Parish, Walter J Senette, Jr, John Phillip Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilton v. St. Mary Parish District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gilton
Defendant:
St. Mary Parish District Attorney Office, Walter J. Senette, Jr., John Phillip Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Thompson Prometric, U.S. Attorney General, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Moorhead, City of et al
as 3:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Tristan Jones Van de Streek, Moorhead, City of, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Clark
as 2:2017cv00619
Petitioner:
John Phillip Martin
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamre v. Swan et al
as 3:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Defendant:
Philip C.R. Swan, Brent Malone, Wade L. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Bender v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20199
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIP BENDER
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bender v. Davis
as 4:2016cv02740
Petitioner:
John Phillip Bender
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
