Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lackie v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Lackie
Defendant:
Dennis, John Putman and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Putman et al
as 4:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
Larry David Johnson
Defendant:
John Putman, Kerry Chism and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillman v. Phillips et al
as 9:2019cv01597
Defendant:
Trevor Phillips, Anthony J. Annucci, Danny Putman and others
Plaintiff:
K'var Tillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausler v. Bradford et al
as 3:2017cv03036
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ausler
Defendant:
Wes Bradford, James Collins, State of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacher v. Russo et al
as 3:2016cv03003
Plaintiff:
Kristofer W. Stacher
Defendant:
John Russo, Christopher Carter, Gordan Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Webb et al
as 3:2015cv03074
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Gordon Webb, John Putman, Wes Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bower v. Putman et al
as 5:2012cv05058
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
John Putman, Ron Kincade, John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bower v. Putman et al
as 4:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
John Putman, Ron Kincade, John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Brown v. AR. Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 11-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy W. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, individually and in his official capactiy, John M. Selig, individually and in his official capacity and others
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
