Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Prince Jones v. US
as 23-6610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LIEUTENANT JERALD RIFFLE, OFFICER TREVOR GEORGE and others
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marc Hall v. Director Herwitz
as 20-6605
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN HAGGAMYER, SARAH SENKO, (PHS), HIT CLERK SHAW and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Hall v. Herwitz et al
as 5:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Captain Phipps, Sarah Senko, Regional Doctor V. Dankwa and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Pierre Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2020cv01501
Defendant:
Charles T. McConville, Richard D. Wetzel and John Pyle
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. United States et al
as 5:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Ian Connors, United States, Captain Phipps and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Pierre Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Dinkins v. John Pyles
as 19-6635
Defendant:
HUNT, Lab Technician/Contractor USP Hazelton, Individually and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DINKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY MIMS, MD and CD/contractor USP Hazelton, indivudually and official capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN PYLES, Provider FNP-BC/Contractor USP Hazelton, individually and official capacity and others
Dinkins v. Pyles et al
as 2:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Defendant:
John Pyles, Gregory Mims, Anne McArdle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
United States, J. Riffle, T. George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Health Care Administrator et al
as 1:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Robert Wright
Defendant:
Health Care Administrator, Joseph Coakley, J Tarovisky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
