Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brent Jacoby v. John Hamm, et al
as 24-10574
Plaintiff:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN Q. HAMM, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and others
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
McArthur Lynch, Jr
Defendant:
Hon. Steve Marshall, John Q. Hamm, Warden Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Petitioner:
Arnaldo Mercado, Dustin Brewer and Steven Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
