Cases 31 - 40 of 92
ROBERTS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11093
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS and PAULINE ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. SROMOVSKY et al
as 2:2017cv02183
Plaintiff:
LORENZO LOPEZ
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERT SROMOVSKY, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and TYREE C. BLOCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. UNITED HEALTH GROUP et al
as 2:2016cv08861
Plaintiff:
DEMOS and JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTH GROUP, CIGNA CORP., HUMANA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Demos et al v. Boeing Company et al
as 1:2016cv01054
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Boeing Company, United Technologies, L-3 Communications and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMOS v. WORLD AIRWAYS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
WORLD AIRWAYS INC., U.S. AIRWAYS, DELTA AIRLINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06653
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHALLENGER v. EMPIRE BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 5:2016cv05040
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT CHALLENGER
Defendant:
EMPIRE BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. , HARRY J. O'NEILL, IV and MELINDA O'NEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howerin Jr. v. Vorous
as 1:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
John Robert Howerin Jr.
Defendant:
Jessica L. Vorous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABBOTT v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02893
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT ABBOTT
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Payne, Sr. v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 15-3055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT PAYNE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
