Cases 1 - 10 of 127
SCOTT v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
LUKE JOHN SCOTT, SR.
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, WOLF and DIRECTOR OF THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Sigle v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Scott Sigle
Defendant:
Sacramento County and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakha Yawuti El v. City of Myrtle Beach
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKHA YAWUTI EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GIOSA and others
John Hudson v. Fredrick Shaw
as 23-6391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK SHAW
Russell v. State of Texas
as 23-10363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Lynn Russell
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General and John Scott, Attorney General, State of Texas, Texas Attorney General
John McClintock, et al v. T. Cooper, et al
as 23-15513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT MCCLINTOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
T. COOPER, Sgt., M. ARMENTA, Guard, WINKLER, Guard and others
Defendant:
B. MCCLOUGHAN, JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, M. VOONG and others
Hudson v. Biancardi et al
as 5:2022ct03445
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Rosemary E. Biancardi, Cory D. Collins, Timothy Vigus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levon Spaulding v. USDC
as 22-7313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVON SPAULDING, a/k/a John Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Raleigh, North Carolina
(PC) McClintock v. Valencia et al
as 2:2022cv01884
Plaintiff:
John Scott McClintock
Defendant:
G. Valencia, L. Cantu, J Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Shaw et al
as 5:2022ct03361
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Sgt. Fredrick Shaw, Corey D. Collins, Brenda J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
