Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spicer v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Elton Spicer
Defendant:
Harris County, John Vickers, Andrew Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vickers et al v. Safeco Insurance Company Of America
as 4:2021cv04025
Plaintiff:
John Vickers and Pauline Vickers
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as KYW/3:15-cv-00842
Plaintiff:
Allen Hicks , Bradley Furlong , Chris Kingery and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG , Syngenta Crop Protection AG , Syngenta Corporation and others
Hicks et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
Allen Hicks , Bradley Furlong , Chris Kingery and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jonathan Simmons v. SCDC
as 12-7848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN DALE SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCDC, JOHN VICKERS, MICHAEL NAJJAR and others
Johnathan Simmons v. John Vicker
as 12-7846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SIMMONS, a/k/a Jonathan Dale Simmons
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN VICKERS, MICHAEL NAJJAR, WARDEN MCCALL and others
-SVH Simmons v. SCDC et al
as 1:2009cv00858
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D Simmons
Defendant:
SCDC , John Vickers , Michael Najjar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Simmons v. SCDC et al
as 2:2009cv00858
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D Simmons
Defendant:
SCDC, John Vickers, Michael Najjar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
-SVH Simmons v. Vickers et al
as 1:2009cv00653
Plaintiff:
Johnathan D Simmons
Defendant:
John Vickers , Michael Najjar , Warden McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
