Cases 71 - 80 of 154
Haynes v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv02032
Plaintiff:
Damon Haynes
Defendant:
Westchester County, Westchester County Department of Corrections, Nyemcheck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. City of Ossining et al
as 1:2018cv01854
Plaintiff:
Robert Hicks
Defendant:
City of Ossining, Ossining Police Department, Arron Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Adams et al
as 9:2017cv01382
Plaintiff:
Quintelle Hardy
Defendant:
Randolph Adams, J. Hatfield and John and Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens, Allan v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Allan Dean Owens
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAllister v. Kirpatrick et al
as 1:2017cv03444
Defendant:
Michael Kirkpatrick, Vonda Johnson, Joanne Waldron and others
Plaintiff:
Yecaira McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF, et at
as 1:2016cv03528
Defendant:
MATTHEW DAVIS, DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv08622
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marshall
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fischer, Bryan Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBER v. SGT. STASSER et al
as 2:2016cv04710
Plaintiff:
RONALD JAMES BARBER
Defendant:
SGT. STASSER, SGT. DANIELLE, MACIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Hepp et al
as 2:2016cv00942
Plaintiff:
Shannon Patterson
Defendant:
Randall Hepp , Charles Larson, Richard Steliga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Sebastian County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2016cv02131
Plaintiff:
Latrelle Arnold
Defendant:
Sebastian County, Arkansas , William Hollenbeck , David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
