Cases 11 - 20 of 4,143
Oakes v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Tyler John Oakes
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
John Rodriguez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
HAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stein v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01720
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Stein
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rogofsky v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Rogofsky
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MASTROGIOVANNI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN MASTROGIOVANNI
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Travis John Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Serri v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
John A Serri
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05250
Plaintiff:
John Alfred Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
