Cases 21 - 30 of 304,040
Heon Yoo v. Brian Barker, et al
as 24-1833
Plaintiff:
HEON JONG YOO, Agent of Hank Yoo
Defendant:
BRIAN BARKER, ASMA NISSAR, CARRIER CLINIC PSYCHIATRISTS and others
Edward Johnson v. Brian Smith, et al
as 24-5436
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, Individually, JOSH STALLONS, Individually and EDWARD EASTMAN, Individually
Johnson v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00831
Petitioner:
Maxwell Garvice Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Doe v. Nash County Board of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Nash County Board of Education, Daniel Colvin, Steven Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Charles Bennett v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 24-1807
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BENNETT
Defendant:
BAYER CORP, An Indiana Corporation, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, a New Jersey Corporation, MERCK & CO INC, a New Jersey Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
