Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Abram et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12021
Plaintiff:
Stephen Abram, Kevin Adams, KayCee Allred and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jonathan Butler v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04128
Defendant:
DuPont De Nemours Inc, The Chemours Company FC LLC, The Chemours Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16994
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BUTLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Terrance Butler
as 22-4392
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE JONATHAN BUTLER
Eady v. Franciosi et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tierre Fady and Tierre Eady
Defendant:
Michael Franciosi, Thomas Mathews, Jeffrey Bell and others
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08361
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00229
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02872
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jonathan Butler v. Mary Berghui
as 15-1111
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN BUTLER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY BERGHUIS, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
