Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
IN RE: JONATHAN JENKINS
as 2:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Jenkins et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Phillippi Sultan Lowe
Defendant:
Jonathan Jenkins, Mark Vermillion and Misty Vermillion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08834
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. The Retreat at Stonecrest
as 1:2019cv00393
Petitioner:
Jonathan Jenkins
Respondent:
The Retreat at Stonecrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jacobsen et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11361
Plaintiff:
Michael Kalmus, Patrick Keane, Michael Jacobsen and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Retreat at Stonecrest Apartmen, et al v. Jonathan Jenkins
as 18-12910
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RETREAT AT STONECREST APARTMENTS and HAMILTON POINT INVESTMENTS
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN JENKINS
Retreat at Stonecrest Apts, et al v. Jonathan Jenkins
as 18-11750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RETREAT AT STONECREST APARTMENTS and HAMILTON POINT INVESTMENTS
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN JENKINS
Retreat at Stonecrest Apartments et al v. Jenkins
as 1:2018cv01356
Plaintiff:
Retreat at Stonecrest Apartments and Hamilton Point Investments
Defendant:
Jonathan Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
