Cases 81 - 90 of 7,624
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv01066
Petitioner:
Shareca Latoya Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Alan Delbert Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tolbert Smith
Defendant:
Judge Mikell Scarborough, Charles Tolbert, Keith L. Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
Dunmore v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bruce Dunmore
Defendant:
Clerk Brenda S. Hamilton, Deputy Clerk of Roanoke Circuit Court, Deputy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
