Cases 71 - 80 of 9,601
Jones v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Landon R. Jones
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Walker v. Travis County, Texas
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, Amber Jones, Vivian Pan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Golden et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Elmira Golden and Mona Rovaris
Defendant:
Edmond Jones, Byrd's Automotive, Continental Western Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Hawkins v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Edwin Hawkins
Defendant:
Jayce Jones and Xavier Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Brian Paul Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Boswell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Boswell and John A Boswell
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, TDC Region 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
