Cases 81 - 90 of 109
Jorge Torres-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-74368
Petitioner:
JORGE ENRIQUE TORRES-GONZALEZ, AKA Jorge Gonzalez, AKA Jorge Torres
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Torres v. Holder
as 13-2498
Petitioner:
Jorge Luna Torres
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
USA v. Jorge Beltran-Torre
as 13-10323
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE BELTRAN-TORRES
Torres, Jr. et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 7:2013cv01635
Petitioner:
Jorge Anibal Torres, Jr. and S.R.N.T.R.
Respondent:
U.S. Department of State and U.S. Embassy in Santo Domingo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Torres, Jr. v. USA
as 2:2013cv00004
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Torres, Jr.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Quiles-Torres v. USA
as 3:2013cv01009
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jorge Quiles-Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez-Ortiz et al v. Corporacion del Centro Cardiovascular de Puerto Rico y del Caribe et al
as 3:2012cv02024
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Ramirez-Ortiz , Jose Irizarry-Ortiz , Javier Irizarry-Ortiz and others
Defendant:
Corporacion del Centro Cardiovascular de Puerto Rico y del Caribe , Dorado Health Inc. , Hospital Bella Vista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Torres et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2012cv04885
Petitioner:
Jorge Anibal Torres, Nathaniel Y. Torres Ramirez, Mary Anne D. Torres Ramirez and others
Respondent:
U.S. Department of State and U.S. Embassy in San Salvador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
US v. Quiles-Torre
as 12-1246
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE QUILES-TORRES, a/k/a Cuajo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
