Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MARIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08641
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE MARIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03207
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JORGE MARIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INFANTE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03132
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN BRAY, JOSHUA CASH, HERIBERTO ESPINOZA and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Infante et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02067
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Bray, Joshua Cash, Heriberto Espinoza and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martagon et al v. Murillo et al
as 3:2018cv02605
Defendant:
Overnight Cleanse LLC and Alejandro Murillo
Plaintiff:
Juan Jorge Marin Hernandez and Rosa Maria Bello Martagon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Delgado v. Marin-Figueroa et al
as 1:2018cv01621
Plaintiff:
Vianey Delgado
Defendant:
Rosando Jorge Marin-Figueroa and Avalanche Property Maintenance Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2014cv62432
Plaintiff:
Jorge Marin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Cortez v. Dimase et al
as 7:2012cv06890
Plaintiff:
Jorge Marin Cortez
Defendant:
Christopher Dimase, The City of Mount Vernon and Mount Vernon Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. Dimase et al
as 1:2012cv06890
Plaintiff:
Jorge Marin Cortez
Defendant:
Christopher Dimase, The City of Mount Vernon and Mount Vernon Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marin-Ramirez v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00673
Petitioner:
Jorge Marin-Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
