Cases 11 - 20 of 22
State of Louisiana v. American Natl Prop & Cslty Co., et al
as 13-90053
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of insured(s)/assignor(s)/subrogor(s) Jorge Ramirez
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, AMERICAN NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and ANPAC LOUISIANA INSURANCE COMPANY
USA v. Jorge Ramirez-Gonzalez
as 13-13703
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE RAMIREZ-GONZALEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Hoff, et al v. Del Carmen Garriga, et al
as 12-1008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUSELL HOFF, GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, NILDA PICO and others
Plaintiff:
CECI MONTILLA-ROJO, CARLOS CAMINO-RIOS, SONIA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ and others
:
LUISA VIRGINIA FUSTER BERLINGERI
Defendant:
POPULAR, INC., RICHARD L. CARRION, JORGE A. JUNQUERA and others
Intervenor:
DALMIS PEREZ
Interested Party - Appellant:
MARIA DEL CARMEN GARRIGA, ALFREDO CARL MELTZ-NARVAEZ, FRANCISCO LOPEZ-DOSAL and others
US v. Angel Jorge Ramirez
as 11-4101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL JORGE RAMIREZ, a/k/a Negro
Ramirez v. Old Republic Default Management Services et al
as 8:2008cv01441
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramirez and Jorge Ramirez
Defendant:
Old Republic Default Management Services, Homeq Servicing and Homeq Servicing
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Jorge Sanchez
as 08-50197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE RAMIREZ SANCHEZ
Stiegwardt et al v. De Amorin et al
as 1:2006cv03739
Plaintiff:
Felix Arturo Stiegwardt, Edgardo Gneri, Angel Scapin and others
Defendant:
International Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
