Cases 1 - 10 of 167
(HC) Lopez-Diaz v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01377
Petitioner:
Jose Javier Lopez-Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jimenez-Lopez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00276
Petitioner:
Jose Jimenez-Lopez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Lopez-Leyva v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00950
Petitioner:
Jose Valentine Lopez-Leyva
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo v. Ixco et al
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo and Jose Ruiz Lopez
Defendant:
Ixco, M. Manker, Mastel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Lopez v. USA
as 22-3175
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE JAIME LOPEZ, also known as JJ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez Carrillo v. Bennett
as 2:2022cv00296
Petitioner:
Jose Mario Lopez Carrillo
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Lopez v. Unknown
as 2:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Jose Franklin Lopez
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon-Rosado v. Roman-Lopez et al
as 3:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Colon-Rosado
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion, Jose Roman-Lopez, Eduardo Carire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lopez-Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00244
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Lopez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez-Flores v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00564
Defendant:
David Jendusa, Pima County Adult Detention, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Lopez-Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
