Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CEPEDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30916
Plaintiff:
JOSE CEPEDA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cepeda v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01145
Petitioner:
Jose Cepeda
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CEPEDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73589
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE CEPEDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America v. Cepeda et al
as 1:2020cv20414
Defendant:
Dinorah Cepeda, Midland Funding LLC and Jose Cepeda
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441
Cepeda v. ATS LLC of Crossville, TN et al
as 3:2019cv01039
Defendant:
Michael A Leck and ATS LLC of Crossville, TN
Plaintiff:
Jose Cepeda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cepeda et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 1:2019cv00160
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association As Trustee for RASC 2006-EMX7 and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Jose Cepeda and Lourdes Cepeda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandez et al v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv01862
Defendant:
Jose Cepeda, CITY OF NEW YORK, AMADEO OKTROVA and others
Plaintiff:
ARIEL OVALLES, JOSE JAVIER FERNANDEZ and ELVIO TORIBIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Cepeda-Martinez
as 16-1323
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE CEPEDA-MARTINEZ
United States of America v. Polanco-Rodriguez (Torres-Nune
as 13-3384
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Santiago L. Polanco-Rodriguez, Santiago A. Polanco-Polanco, Ramon Del Rosario and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Persio Torres-Nunez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
