Cases 1 - 10 of 501
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cymbidium Restoration, LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Cymbidium Restoration, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. and Jose Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lopez-Lopez v. Garland
as 24-741
Petitioner:
FERNANDO JOSE LOPEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sierra v. JST Transportes S.A. De C.V. et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Sierra
Defendant:
JST Transportes S.A. De C.V. and Jose Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lopez Cerna v. Garland
as 23-3827
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE LOPEZ CERNA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Casillas v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez-Casillas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Lopez-Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3577
Petitioner:
GILBERTO ISAEL LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, NANCY ADALI COLLADO-JUAREZ, SASHA SAMANTA LOPEZ-COLLADO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lugo v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00131
Petitioner:
Jose Lopez Lugo
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02535
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Lopez and Jose Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
