Cases 1 - 10 of 1,049
USA v. Diaz Borrome, et al
as 24-2039
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ESTEBAN RAFAEL DIAZ BORROME, also known as Esteban Rafael Borrome Diaz, BEN CARRASQUILLOSANTO, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ MONTESINO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Diaz v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Diaz
Defendant:
Alexandro Ramirez, Keneth Kenner, Traser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Odum Services, LLC v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Odum Services, LLC
Defendant:
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company, Everest National Insurance Company, Jose Manuel Salomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Beltran v. Cheremonv et al
as 6:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Alexandra Cheremonv and Drake Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puculpala-Morocho v. Garland
as 24-1047
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL PUCULPALA-MOROCHO, JONATHON CALEB PUCULPALA-AGUALSACA, KEVIN ALEXANDER ANDAGANA-AGUALSACA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
