Cases 1 - 10 of 104
VAZQUEZ v. RIVELLO
as 2:2023cv02579
Petitioner:
JOSE VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BURKE et al v. BACHERT et al
as 5:2023cv01959
Plaintiff:
SEAN P BURKE, EQUINOX ADVANTAGE REAL ESTATE I, INC., STELLA CADENTE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF EDWARD BACHERT, OFFICER RICHARD PENN, CHARLES F ZURICK, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Richmond County Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Richmond County Supreme Court, Mokse, Judge Gawsino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez et al v. Bart GC Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez Gomez and Juan Vazquez Magueyal
Defendant:
Bart GC Corp. and Krzysztof Mendys
Vazquez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06216
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vazquez v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01430
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VAZQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09021
Plaintiff:
JOSE VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valencia v. Garland
as 22-311
Petitioner:
ALICIA BENITEZ VALENCIA, JOSE VAZQUEZ BENITEZ, DULCE VAZQUEZ BENITEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
VAZQUEZ III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62285
Plaintiff:
JOSE VAZQUEZ III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAZQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57138
Plaintiff:
JOSE VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
