Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust
as 23-294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Loretta Gay Scamp
Defendant / Appellee:
Higgins Family Trust, Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams and others
Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust et al
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Loretta Gay Scamp
Defendant:
Higgins Family Trust, Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crosby v. Vannoy
as 6:2018cv00536
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crosby, Jr
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Crosby, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 16-30883
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH CROSBY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Harmon v. Crosby et al
as 4:2015cv03007
Plaintiff:
Austin Lee Harmon
Defendant:
Joseph Crosby, Brittanie Holmes, Larry Gist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Crosby v. United States
as 14-3231
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Joseph Crosby, also known as Michael Joseph Krzyzaniak
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Crosby v. Cain et al
as 6:2013cv02134
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crosby, Jr
Defendant:
N Burl Cain and LA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv02580
Plaintiff:
Joseph Crosby, Jr.
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Michael Krzyzaniak
as 12-1524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Joseph Krzyzaniak, also known as Michael Joseph Crosby
CROSBY et al v. OWENS- CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64304
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CROSBY and HILDA CROSBY
Defendant:
OWENS- CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
