Cases 1 - 10 of 134
HIGGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20497
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HIGGS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv05657
Plaintiff:
Sean Cook and Joseph Higgs
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald Walkinshaw and John Pound
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lyle Floyd v. City of Grand Coulee, et al
as 21-35917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE FLOYD, a single person
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GRAND COULEE, J. D. TUFTS, Grand Coulee Police Chief, GARY W. MOORE, Sergeant and others
Floyd v. City of Grand Coulee et al
as 2:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Lyle Floyd
Defendant:
City of Grand Coulee, JD Tufts, Sergeant Gary W Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. The Pavilion at Williamsburg
as 1:2020cv01179
Plaintiff:
Darryl John Joseph Higgs, Jr.
Defendant:
The Pavilion at Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. The Pavilion at Williamsburg
as 7:2020cv00590
Plaintiff:
Darryl John Joseph Higgs, Jr.
Defendant:
The Pavilion at Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29817
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kruckenberg v. Ransome et al
as 2:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
James Kruckenberg
Defendant:
Ransome and Joseph Higgs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Adcock, et al
as 2:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
SGT Adcock, Corporal Foster, Nurse Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Perry
Defendant:
Barbra Meade and Joseph Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
