Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Howell v. Hogan et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Darlene E. Howell and Darlene Eubank Howell
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr. and Tiffany P. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ZAHIR v. HOGAN et al
as 3:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Naja Talibah Zahir
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr., Governor of Virginia Ralph Northam, James Mountcastle and others
Trustee:
Queen Naja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cannady v. Hogan et al
as 1:2021cv00869
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH HOGAN, JR., Scott G. Patterson, STEPHEN HUGHES KEYHOE and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Cannady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manetirony Clervrain v. Lawrence Hogan
as 20-7490
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN SONDWED, BRIAN E. FROSH, JOHN CASPER WOBENSMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Student A et al v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01434
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH HOGAN, JR., Board of Regents of the University System of Maryland and Governor Larry Hogan
Plaintiff:
Matthew Zaleskas, Student A and Evan Zaleskas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doyle v. Hogan et al
as 1:2019cv00190
Plaintiff:
Christopher Doyle and LPC, LCPC Christopher Doyle
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH HOGAN, JR. and Brian E Frosh
Amicus Curiae:
FreeState Justice, Inc. and The Trevor Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ali v. Hogan et al
as 1:2019cv00078
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr. and Brian E. Frosh
Plaintiff:
Saqib Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kim v. Eisner et al
as 1:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Ok Cha Kim
Defendant:
Lori Joy Eisner , Kendra Young Ausby , W. Michel Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOGAN v. HOGAN
as 1:2016cv01538
Respondent:
Mariluz Hogan
Petitioner:
Joseph Hogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
