Cases 1 - 10 of 11
INGRAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14082
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH INGRAMS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02145
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Patterson, Jesus Romero, Stephanie Rudser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02693
Plaintiff:
Darryl Patterson, Jesus Romero, Stephanie Rudser and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
MIMMS et al v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv04562
Plaintiff:
HARRY MIMMS and JOSEPH INGRAM
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIMMS et al v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv02111
Plaintiff:
HARRY MIMMS and JOSEPH INGRAM
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00556
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02345
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01525
Plaintiff:
Lori Finn, Jessica Burge, Joseph Ingram and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00341
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
