Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Carl McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Correc
as 21-3048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL JOSEPH MCDANIEL
Defendant / Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01919
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Warden Cooper, Jim Zanon and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Joseph McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl McDaniel v. Salam Syed, et al
as 20-2946
Defendant / Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SALAM SYED, Doctor, in his individual capacity, MICHAEL FINK, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL JOSEPH MCDANIEL
Carl McDaniel v. Salam Syed, et al
as 20-1044
Defendant / Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SALAM SYED, Doctor, SUSAN NOVAK, Warden, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL JOSEPH MCDANIEL
McDaniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01230
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NICHOLSON et al v. SELECT MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00519
Plaintiff:
BRIONA ALLEN, CAMERON MOODY, TAMMY ROGERS and others
Defendant:
KIPLING FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, LOANMAX, LLC, LOANSMART, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniels v. Mesenek et al
as 5:2019cv00084
Defendant:
FNU Mesenek, United States of America and FNU Miller
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniels v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2019cv00016
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDaniels v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv00247
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniels
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McDaniel v. Jones et al
as 6:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniel
Defendant:
R. Jones and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
