Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Peck v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv05454
Petitioner:
Joseph Ross Peck
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jeremy Ross v. Director Dept of Correction
as 15-6870
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY JOSEPH ROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPT OF CORRECTIONS OF VIRGINIA
Ross v. Director Dept of Correction of Virginia
as 1:2014cv01356
Petitioner:
Jeremy Joseph Ross
Respondent:
Director Dept of Correction of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20928
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ross and Joseph Ross
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd County, et al v. Merscorp, Inc., et al
as 14-5647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOYD COUNTY, ex rel Phillip Hedrick as County Attorney, BREATHITT COUNTY, ex rel Brendon Miller as County Attorney, CARTER COUNTY, ex rel Patrick Flannery as County Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Jeremy Ross v. Terrence Schultz
as 13-7459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY JOSEPH ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRENCE SCHULTZ, City of VA Beach Police Officer and SHAUN LINDEMEYER, City of VA Beach Police Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
