Cases 1 - 10 of 55
State of Washington v. Steinke
as 24-535
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ADAM EDWARD STEINKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH STANLEY PIGOTT
Trotter v. Texas Office of the Attorney General et al
as 3:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanley Trotter
Defendant:
Texas Office of the Attorney General and Grexco Technology Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stanley et al v. National General Accident and Health Company et al
as 2:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanley and Ashley Stanley
Defendant:
National Health Insurance Company, Healthcare Solutions Team, LLC, CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States v. Harjo
as 23-7022
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH STANLEY HARJO
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STANLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley et al v. The Phoenix Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Theresa Stanley and Joseph Stanley
Defendant:
The Phoenix Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STANLEY III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38406
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STANLEY III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VALENTINO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38605
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STANLEY VALENTINO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANLEY v. INCH
as 4:2021cv00198
Defendant:
MARK INCH
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JOSEPH STANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jankowski v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv08062
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanley Jankowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
