Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rodney Brown v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-2460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rodney Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Steiger, Phil Harden, John Does, 1-3 and others
Bradley Steiger v. Warden, et al
as 21-10045
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER
USA v. Bradley Steiger
as 20-11986
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Steiger v. United States Probation Office (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00613
Defendant:
United States Probation Office
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steiger v. Simmons(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00599
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Derrick Cunningham and Marcus Simmons
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bradley Joseph Steiger v. United States Federal Probation Office
as 3:2019cv02882
Petitioner:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Respondent:
United States Federal Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Trump et al
as 4:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Rodney Brown
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, St. Louis, Missouri, City of , Matthew T. Boettigheimer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. St. Louis City Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv02711
Plaintiff:
Reginald Patrick McCray
Defendant:
St. Louis City Police Department, David King and Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Bradley Steiger
as 17-15033
Petitioner:
In re: BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bradley Steiger v. Luther Strange, III, et al
as 17-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER
Defendant - Appellee:
LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, State Attorney General, in his Individual and official capacity, MARY BECKER WINDOM, Chief Appellate Judge, in her individual and official capacity, MARK BRUTON, ADOC Records Director, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
