Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Kelly v. Wali et al
as 7:2025cv04119
Plaintiff:
Akeem Kelly
Defendant:
Sgt. Saida Wali, C.O. Joseph Sullivan, C.O. Brian Albert and others
Interested Party:
Office of the New York State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Xu
as 25-982
Plaintiff:
MARK JOSEPH SULLIVAN
Defendant:
BINONG XU, THE CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER, SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sullivan v. Starnes et al
as 1:2024cv02090
Defendant:
Dimitry Droujinsk, Myanthony Starnes and Withney Ray
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sullivan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sullivan v. Xu et al
as 1:2024cv05946
Defendant:
Binong Xu, The Santuary for Families, Amanda White and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan v. Xu et al
as 1:2024cv05975
Defendant:
Tahilisa Brougham, Binong Xu, Judge Amanda White and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 7:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Tracey Beltz, Sara Hennessey and Janett Kindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 7:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Tracey Beltz, Keith Ellison, Jannett Kindall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Sullivan v. Tracy Beltz, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Beltz, Warden, Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, Faribault, MN and Keith M. Ellison, AG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
