Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Asha Kelly, Joseph Walker, Ashley Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Andrew Schmidt, et al v. Cal Dive International, Inc.
as 18-30800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW SCHMIDT, THOMAS R. EDWARDS, THOMAS R. EDWARDS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNDERWRITERS SEVERALLY SUBSCRIBING LLOYDS POLICY PE0903008
Alexander v. General Insurance Company of A
as 16-3166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
April M. Alexander and Joseph Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
General Insurance Company of America
Alexander et al v. General Insurance Company Of America
as 3:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
April M. Alexander and Joseph Walker
Defendant:
General Insurance Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Cal Dive International Inc et al
as 6:2015cv02528
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walker
Defendant:
Underwriters Severally Subscribing Lloyds Policy PE0903008, Kyle Schonekas, Joelle F Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Northland Insurance Company v. Offield et al
as 2:2010cv00951
Plaintiff:
Northland Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carla Offield, Joseph Walker, LP Transport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Walker et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Elizabeth Ashley Walker, John Walker, Joseph Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Continental Casualty Company et al v. RB Contracting Co LP et al
as 3:2009cv02485
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company, Continental Casualty Company, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and others
Defendant:
RB Contracting Co LP, RB Enterprises LLC, RB Contracting Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
