Cases 1 - 10 of 301
US v. Nathaniel Josey
as 24-6358
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL JOSEY, a/k/a Neil
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Josey-Myles v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Adrian Josey-Myles
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
TERRELL v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
LORI E. TERRELL
Defendant:
CHERYL R. BAILEY, LAURA A. CORDERO, ZABRINA W. DEMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOSEY v. US POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2023cv24713
Plaintiff:
ANTON J JOSEY
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, City of Orange Police Department, District Attorney Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STULL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23576
Plaintiff:
JOSEY STULL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edward Josey et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04549
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Josey and Debra Josey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curtis et al v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05741
Plaintiff:
Aila Curtis, Ciera Agee, Alison Archer and others
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, PeaceHealth, Liz Dunne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
