Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review, et al
as 22-56036
Plaintiff / Appellant: AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellee: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-55988
Plaintiff / Appellee: AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commiser of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities and others
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56287
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM A. FERRARA, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBPs Office of Field Operations, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Appellant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56417
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, United States Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Jose Barillas v. William Barr
as 19-1604
Petitioner: JOSE ROMERO BARILLAS, a/k/a Jose Romero, a/k/a Juan Doe, a/k/a Jose Barillas
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Al Otro Lado, Inc. et al v. McAleenan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02366
Plaintiff: Al Otro Lado, Inc., Jose Doe, Beatrice Doe and others
Defendant: Todd C. Owen, Elaine C. Duke, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Respondent: DOES 1-10, inclusive
Amicus Curiae: the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights at the University of Chicago Law School, Kids in Need of Defense, Members of Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 dj
Renfro et al v. J.G. Boswell Co. Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00418
Plaintiff: Christopher Renfro and Sima Edsell
Defendant: J.G. Boswell Co. Inc., J.G. Boswell Tomato Co. Kern, J.G. Boswell Tomato Co Kings and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajad, et al v. Thomas E. Perez, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3557
Plaintiff - Appellant: COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS, PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE, NORTHWEST FOREST WORKER CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ERIC M. SELEZNOW, In His Official Capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary For Employment and Training
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS et al v. PEREZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02657
Plaintiff: COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS , PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE , NORTHWEST FOREST WORKER CENTER and others
Defendant: THOMAS E. PEREZ , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ERIC M. SELEZNOW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv01252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?