Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nunez v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00870
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julio Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as NJ/2:17-cv-07101
Plaintiff:
JULIO NUNEZ
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD DAVOL, INC.
NUNEZ v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07101
Plaintiff:
JULIO NUNEZ
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 1:2017cv07101
Plaintiff:
JULIO NUNEZ
Defendant:
C.R. BARD INC. and BARD DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolmo et al v. CPN Mechanical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06691
Defendant:
CPN Mechanical Inc., Charly Ho, Constantin Nikolis and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Dolmo, Oscar Dolmo, Jose Geovanny Guity Arriola and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ponce v. USA
as 4:2015cv00032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julio Nunez Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. La Huerta Mexican Restaurant Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc , Stone Diamond Music Corporation , House of Bryant Publications LLC and others
Defendant:
La Huerta Mexican Restaurant Inc and Julio Nunez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
United States v. Ponce
as 12-5032
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO NUNEZ PONCE, AKA Julio Ponce
Tillman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01470
Plaintiff:
Kareem Tillman
Defendant:
The City of New York , Julio Nunez and P.O.'s John Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaya-Stewart et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv20083
Plaintiff:
Dyanara Amaya-Stewart, Dyanara Amaya-Stewart, Dyanara Amaya-Stewart and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
