Cases 1 - 10 of 733
Jones v. Davis
as 23-10331
Petitioner / Appellant:
Justin Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Davis, Warden and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kentrell Welch v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-16893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, STEVE SISOLAK, Terminated per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint, AARON FORD, Terminated #7AC and others
Jones v. Davis
as 3:2022cv01684
Petitioner:
Justin Jones
Respondent:
FNU Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Welch v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00272
Defendant:
William Gittere, Katherine Brodie, Dewayne Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmot v. Neosho County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03268
Defendant:
Neosho County Jail, Antony Allison, (fnu) Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael Wilmot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Johnson
Defendant:
CORIZON LLC, Tom Bredman, Milton Hammerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Corizon LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Johnson
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, Tom Bredman, Milton Hammerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00183
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JUSTIN JONES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
