Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Macon et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2026cv02519
Plaintiff:
Rachel Macon and Danielle Ross
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Kameron Christopher Harvanek, Brittany Ann Chastang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Annucci
as 25-921
Defendant:
B. FLEURY, DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE J. BARNES
Russell v. Scott
as 24-3312
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF THE VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
JASON SCOTT
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RUSSELL
Hall v. Eddy et al
as 3:2024cv03332
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Melinda Eddy, Justin Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeckeya Perry v. Ivory McDaniel, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zeckeya Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Ivory T. McDaniel, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, Wendy Kelley, Previous Director and others
Russell v. Scott
as 5:2020cv00184
Plaintiff:
Justin Russell
Defendant:
Jason Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Scott
as 2:2020cv00184
Plaintiff:
Justin Russell
Defendant:
Jason Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41442
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Annucci et al
as 9:2019cv00109
Defendant:
William Hoffnagle, Kevin P. Bruen, Brian Gary and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
