Cases 1 - 10 of 42
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowdell v. Byrd et al.
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Nailah K. Byrd, Leslie Celebrezze, Ditko Devione and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Courthouse News Service v. Byrd
as 1:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Clerk Nailah K. Byrd and Nailah K. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grove v. Byrd et al
as 6:2023cv02491
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Alexander Grove
Defendant:
Bryan K Byrd, Kayleen Paterson, Director Neil Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frett Ali v. Byrd et al
as 1:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Demetrius-Anderson Frett Ali
Defendant:
Nailah K. Byrd, Judge Kathleen A. Sutula and Belind Kyle-Gest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Byrd v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00895
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Byrd
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60, Inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller El et al v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller El and Nathaniel D. Taylor El
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Cuyahoga Cleveland, David Matia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Byrd v. Duval County
as 3:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Samuel K. Byrd
Defendant:
Duval County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2020cv02809
Defendant:
Christine Vachas, Michael C. O'Malley, Nilah K. Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton B. Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
