Cases 41 - 50 of 492
Dunkle v. Carmack et al
as 8:2022cv02497
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Dunkle
Defendant:
N. Carmack, C. M. Fraccica, A. Sievers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dunkle v. Pasco County Police Department et al
as 8:2022cv02368
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Dunkle
Defendant:
Pasco County Police Department, N. Carmack, T T Croker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyler v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jevon Rasheed Moyler
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison and K. M. Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maybush et al v. Putze et al
as 3:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Ronald Maybush and K. M.
Defendant:
Peggy Putze and Putze's Mobile Home Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Jones v. Gates et al
as 3:2022cv50299
Plaintiff:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
A. S. Gates, R. C. Redel, T. D. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. McCoy et al
as 1:2022cv07230
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Woodson
Defendant:
Lisaraye McCoy and K&M Consulting & Taxing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOWMAN v. K M SPECIALTY PUMPS
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
SETH BOWMAN
Defendant:
K M SPECIALTY PUMPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Wild v. K&M Services of SW Florida Inc
as 2:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
K&M Services of SW Florida Inc dba Ranson Brothers and K&M Services of SW Florida Inc doing business as Ranson Brothers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
