Cases 11 - 20 of 29,023
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fuerst v. K&R LLC
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Ann Fuerst
Defendant:
K&R LLC doing business as 518 Auto Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
US v. Perez-Gonzalez
as 24-1454
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSEPH EFRAIN PEREZ-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Peca, a/k/a Stripper
US v. Luis Garza
as 24-4262
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS BRADLEY GARZA, a/k/a Brad
US v. Orlando Pendleton, Jr.
as 24-4263
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ORLANDO D. PENDLETON, JR., a/k/a Nuc, a/k/a TRT
Andrich v. Glynn, et al.
as 24-3078
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Defendant:
COURTNEY R. GLYNN, in her individual, official and supervisory capacities, BRAD K. KEOUGH, in his individual, supervisory and official capacities, DAVID SHINN, in his official capacity and others
Fowler and Sons, INC v. James A Fowler, III et al
as 1:2024cv11265
Plaintiff:
Fowler and Sons, INC; and The Fowler & Sons, INC. 401 (K)
Defendant:
James A Fowler, III, Charles W Fowler, Michael H Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lu v. Rocah
as 24-1283
Plaintiff:
JIANQIAO LU
Defendant:
MIRIAM ROCAH, -, in her official capacity as District Attorney for Westchester County, CATALINA BLANCO BUITRAGO, in her official capacity as Assistant District Attorney for Westchester County, LETITIA JAMES, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York and others
USA v. Francis Battista
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. BATTISTA, a/k/a FRANK BATTISTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
