Cases 31 - 40 of 13,227
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
John H. Sloan
Defendant:
Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flanagan v. Walmart Corporation et al
as 9:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Theodore Flanagan
Defendant:
Walmart Corporation and Connie K. Wu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Herrington v. Cory et al
as 1:2024cv02940
Plaintiff:
Benjamin K Herrington
Defendant:
Aaron Cory and Grundy County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington Jr. v. Stafford County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington Jr.
Defendant:
Stafford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington, Jr. v. SMK Law Group
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
SMK Law Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nord Hodges et al v. Passidomo et al
as 8:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Keto Nord Hodges, Meiko Seymour, Jarvis K. El-Amin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Passidomo and Cord Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Bennett v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BENNETT, a/k/a Bennett Anthony
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., JEROME POWELL, JANET L. YELLEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Couch v. USA, et al
as 24-1565
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Attn: Representative Andre Carson and/or Representative Greg Pence, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, a/k/a UNIGOV a/k/a THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS UNIGOV MARION COUNTY INDIANA; Attn: Mayor Joe Hogsett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
