Cases 21 - 30 of 13,239
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jamieson et al v. Alvaro et al
as 6:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Jamieson and Deidra Janee Wills
Defendant:
Chad K. Alvaro and Christine E. Arendas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeanne K. Williams v. ABC School District
as 2:2024cv03311
Plaintiff:
Jeanne K. Williams
Defendant:
ABC School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05571
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ALL BIDEN CABINET MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White, Nathan v. Moran, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Nathan Alexander White
Defendant:
Michael K. Moran and Amanda J. Ley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
