Cases 1 - 10 of 52
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
Lane v. Haozhi et al
as 1:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
John K. Lane
Defendant:
Yang Haozhi, Yang Liang, Ge Bing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
LOGAN v. GODWIN et al
as 3:2022cv09565
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant:
GODWIN, T DYKES, P WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munt et al v. WEC Energy Group Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Munt, Gloria J Harmon and Sandra M Wingers
Defendant:
WEC Energy Group, Inc., Board of Directors of WEC Energy Group, Inc., Curt S Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LANE v. CITY OF ROCKLAND et al
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
GLENNIS K LANE
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKLAND, THOMAS LUTTRELL, CHRISTOPHER YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46057
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24241
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER K LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Nathaniel B. Sobayo
as 5:2020mc80145
Appellee:
Daniel Butt, Hong Jacqueline Gardner, Robert K Lane and others
Appellant:
Nathaniel Basolo Sobayo
Tiger Capital Group v. American Heritage Billiards, LLC et. al.
as 2:2020cv03440
Plaintiff:
Tiger Capital Group
Defendant:
Great Gatherings, American Heritage Billiards, LLC, Joseph Pucci and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Menachem Sibler, K&M Recovery LLC, Supreme Capital Source and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
John K Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
