Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Lewis v. Jester
as 1:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Jester
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Independence First Inc v. Independence First Health Care Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Independence First, Inc. and Independence First Inc
Defendant:
Independence First Health Care Inc, Tenesha D. Grace, Debbie L. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Coles v. Dalton et al
as 7:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Coles
Defendant:
G. Dalton, K. Lewis, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Dalton et al
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Coles
Defendant:
G Dalton, K. Lewis, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Respondent:
SHAWN GILLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Ben Hill County, Georgia
as 4:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Ben Hill County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
