Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Moore v. Strength of Nature, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08939
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Moore
Defendant:
Strength of Nature, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., LOreal USA, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore-Pryor v. FNJ Studios LLC et al
as 2:2026cv08316
Plaintiff:
Andascha Moore-Pryor
Defendant:
FNJ Studios LLC, Nathan Scherrer, Alex Martini and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02434
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 3:2026cv01068
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv04181
Plaintiff:
Chad A Moore
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv13428
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 2:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. James et al
as 5:2026ct03223
Plaintiff:
Patrick Chambers and Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Jamal James, Shakeeba Hudson, Justin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Moore
as 1:2026cv01167
Plaintiff:
Ruth Jones
Defendant:
Lori Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
