Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brazier v. East Saint Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03894
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Brazier
Defendant:
East Saint Louis Police Department, K. Randolph, J. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merlin Williams v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. New York State
as 1:2021cv10959
Plaintiff:
Ryan K. Randolph
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. New York State
as 1:2021cv09243
Plaintiff:
Ryan K. Randolph
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bildrick Jackson v. Michael Randolph, et al
as 18-60562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILDRICK JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, Mississippi Supreme Court Justice, JAMES W. KITCHENS, Mississippi Supreme Court Justice and JAMES D. MAXWELL, Associate Mississippi Supreme Court Justice
Jackson v. Randolph et al
as 4:2018cv00142
Defendant:
James D. Maxwell, Michael K. Randolph and James W. Kitchens
Plaintiff:
Bildrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
