Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Wolf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Margaret K. Wolf
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dominique Johnson v. TD Bank NA, et al
as 22-3363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE JOHNSON, a/k/a THE CONFINED HUMAN COLLECTIVE
Defendant / Appellee:
TD BANK NA, DENNIS K. WOLF, REGINA LASIEWSKI and others
JOHNSON v. TD BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2022cv04108
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE JOHNSON and THE CONFINED HUMAN COLLECTIVE
Defendant:
TD BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, DENNIS K WOLF, REGINA LASIEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Cheryl K. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wolf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01678
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Margaret K. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MADISON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv01655
Respondent:
STEPHEN P. STEINER, JOHN WETZEL, PAROLE AGENT DAREK EBERHARDT and others
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE J. MADISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolf v. Walgreen Co.
as 0:2020cv02111
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jarozewski v. Rajendra et al
as 1:2020cv00215
Defendant:
William P. Greubel, Gene C. Wulf, Ajita G. Rajendra and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Jarozewski
Nominal Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation
Pierce v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02127
Defendant:
William P. Greubel, Gene C. Wulf, Ajita G. Rajendra and others
Nominal Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ian Pierce
Pierce v. Rajendra et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
Mark D Smith, Gloster B Current, Kevin Wheeler and others
Nominal Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ian Pierce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
