Cases 21 - 30 of 218
Welsh v. Lubbock County
as 22-10382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant / Appellee:
Lubbock County, Kelly Rowe, Sheriff, C. Scott, Chief Jail Administrator and others
Young v. Bosch
as 0:2021cv02598
Petitioner:
Divaunte K. Young
Respondent:
Warden Guy Bosch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Young
as 1:2021cv05253
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Allen K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CAREY et al v. BOARDWALK REGENCY, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv13700
Plaintiff:
VANDA E. CAREY and THOMAS P. CAREY
Defendant:
BOARDWALK REGENCY, LLC and CHANG K. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-20185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Van Overdam
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael K. Young, In his official capacity, Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity and others
Flores v. Young et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and K Young
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-90008
Respondent:
Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity, Texas A & M University and others
Petitioner:
Austin Van Overdam
Anduze v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01665
Defendant:
Dychese, Drumwright, Tiffany Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmanni Anduze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01083
Defendant:
CO Graves, CO Rodriguez, Captain Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anduze v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
Capt. Loiseau, Captain Bernard Mathis, CO Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Johmanni Anduze
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ADW Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
