Cases 1 - 10 of 10
v. Donovan et al
as 8:2023cv01100
Defendant:
Micheal Donovan and Karen Campbell-McGaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Karen Elizabeth Campbell v. Verizon
as 1:2020cv01655
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Sanofi US Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv15541
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03382
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. PRG Real Estate Management Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01727
Plaintiff:
Leesa C Watson
Defendant:
PRG Real Estate Management Inc , Franklin Pineridge Associates , Nayeli Lozada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01276
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colon et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 4:2009cv04158
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon, Daniel Anderson, Althea Block and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colon et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 3:2009cv04158
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon, Daniel Anderson, Althea Block and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Karen L Campbell v. Gary Vianco et al
as 5:2007cv01166
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell
Defendant:
Gary Vianco, Jovanni Miramontes, Jose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CAMPBELL et al v. FIRST TRANSIT, INC.
as 2:2007cv03316
Plaintiff:
REUBEN CAMPBELL and KAREN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
