Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Rodney Winchester v. David Gladieux, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
RODNEY K. WINCHESTER
Defendant:
DAVID GLADIEUX, KAREN RICHARDS and ANY UNNAMED UNKNOWN POLICY MAKER
Mudd v. City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Boris Mudd
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne Police Department, Karen Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patmon v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Paris R Patmon
Defendant:
David Gladieux, Karen Richards and Any Unamed Unknown Policy Maker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winchester v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
Rodney K Winchester
Defendant:
David Gladieux, Karen Richards and Any un-named/unknown policy maker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warfield v. Richards et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
John Henry Warfield and John H Warfield
Defendant:
Karen Richards and State Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Karen Richards
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flowers v. Villages of Hanna et al
as 3:2020cv00971
Defendant:
Thomas L Strausberger, Adam Mildred, France C Gull and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zefan Bey v. Richards
as 1:2020cv00399
Plaintiff:
Aqil Zefan Bey and Brandon T Holloway
Defendant:
Karen Richards doing business as Allen County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohr v. H.J. Mohr & Sons Company Pension Trust Plan et al
as 1:2020cv06228
Plaintiff:
Steven Mohr
Defendant:
Karen Richards and H.J. Mohr & Sons Company Pension Trust Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
